© 1998 VNN
| WORLD December 7, 1998 VNN2627 See Related VNN Stories Report About China BBT BY GOVARDHAN YATRA AND NANADGRAM YATRA CHINA, Dec 7 (VNN) — TO ALL GBC MEMBERS OF SRILA PRABHUPADA's ISKCON and BBT (unedited version) Dear respectful Maharajas and all assembled Vaishnava devotees Please accept our humble obeisance, All glories to Srila Prabhupada and Sri Gaura-Nitai! The following story is a summary report about China BBT and how Tamal Krishna Goswami's mistreated, cheated and cracked down his Chinese "Disciples", other story such as Tamal Krishna Goswami Teaching and preaching activities, How Tamal Krishna Goswami witch-hunting his disciples in China will be separately offered. It was about in 1992, Tamal Krishna Goswami determined to let his beloved disciple Ekacakra Das and Umapati Swami join into Hongkong BBT (Chinese BBT), TKG told his Chinese BBT members that Ekacakra (from French ) and Umapati ( from UAS) just finished their Mandarin Study in Taiwan. At the beginning, Ekacakra and Umapati Swami were humble but unfortunately they misunderstood their master TKG's purpose for their arrangement. As time passed away, they really realized the ambition of TKG. Ekacakra and Umpapati in no time promote their Sanskrit Philosophy and Hippie philosophy to their Chinese fallen souls, and try to establish their own authority on translation of Bhagavad gita as it is from English into Chinese. While they are executing their" conspiracy ", they found some troubles come from TKG's god-brother Yasomatisuta Das, because Yaso is the first Chinese disciple of Srila Prabhupada and SP had authorized Yaso Prabhu to translate HDG's books into Chinese. If Yaso is still stayed in HK BBT, some day in future Yaso would expose what TKG and His bloc have done in the International. From then on, Ekacakra and Umapati become mad to fight against Yaso Prabhu and tried to find stone from the egg on Yaso's Translation of BG and SB. During in 1997, Ekacakra and Umapati Swami have finally revealed their " true Colors " to Yasomatisuta Das, beginning from a common debate to the last personal attacks against Yaso Prabhu. Under all pressure from TKG and his bloc, Yaso prabhu has to accept the authority of GBC, He withdrawn from HK BBT administration in November.1997, One year later, Yaso Prabhu was kicked out by TKG from Hongkong Temple (poor Yaso prabhu has become another victim of TKG witch-hunting). From 1993 to 1997, other Chinese devotees who engaged in Translation of HDGSP Books into Chinese have one by one kicked out by Ekacakra and Umapati, for those Chinese devotees did not accept Ekacakra and Umapati Swami's "supreme authority" in this field. Most of those devotees engaged in Translation are Post-graduate or graduated from Foreign Language College, They think Ekacakra and Umapati Swami' s Chinese translation (Language) is not acceptable. Those devotees unfortunately wrote letters (reports) to TKG to express their complains, but they all become the victims of TKG witch-hunting, one by one was kicked out by TKG from Chinese BBT. After kicking out that devotee, Ekacakra and Umapati Swami would preach the "fact of that devotee " to other innocent disciples that " someone is a great offender of Vaishnava and guru, he has fallen down into maya, so on. That will remind of us the story of H.H Kavichandra in Japan, while he deal with his Japanese translator, his philosophy was actually used by his friends in China (please VNN Story 1797 and VNN2573). Ekacakra and Umapati Swami think that no one of Chinese devotees can be qualified to translate HDG SP's books into Chinese, and Yaso's Translation is a kind of "Mayavadi ", only their translation is good. Now the BG was printed in Taiwan and Distributed in China (including Hongkong SAR, Taiwan region), the fact is that Ekacakra and Umapati have re-written Chinese Version Bhagavad gita AS IT IS (detailed reports will be offer in another paper if necessary). It was above in October 1997, when Chinese devotees knew that the new Chinese version of Bhagavad Gita (CBG 97 version) translated by Ekacakra and Umapati is complete different from what we have learnt. We wrote letters to Yaso and Ekacakra to require them to explain what is that problem, but until now we did not get any reasonable reply on those "problems" as Ekacakra and Umapati Swami alleged in Hongkong. After carefully reading and comparing different version of Chinese BG ( Ekacakra and Umapati Swami in China has made four Chinese version of BG) with original English version BG of Srila Rpabhupada, WE decided to write a letter to Hongkong BBT, Yaso prabhu, TKG, Ekacakra , Giridhari Swami, Ekacakra and Umapati Swami to express opinions on this matter: 90 percent of Chinese Devotees will definitely not accept Ekacakra and Umapati version of BG. We have made Such decision and choice not because of our strong feelings for Yaso Prabhu as Ekacakra and Umapati alleged, or some key terms translation have " problem ", but most because the New Chinese version of BG is complete deviated in philosophy from that of Srila Prabhupada, (according to Umapati Swami saying, they have set up their own new criterion to RE-WRITE this Book). Under this situation, Hongkong BBT meeting was held in Shenzhen (near Hongkong) in November 1997, before Umapati Swami leaving his headquarter Beijing, he has advised with his disciples and others devotees on this matter (No one will like to accept Ekacakra's books), he made promise to his disciples that he will present their opinions to this meeting. When Umapati Swami came back from Shenzhen, he did not mentioned anything about the result this meeting, He just told his disciples not to fight against Ekacakra, otherwise you will become a Bhakta (Bhaktine) from your Maharaja position (or Dasa and Dasi). Considering his position and Ekacakra's situaiton, Umapati Swami no longer considers himself an official member of the BBT. Umapati Swami begins to serve as fighter of Networks. Ekacakra and his wife Jahnava dd found the situation is not favorable to them, they started a diplomatic trip in order to convince Chinese Devotees to accept his book of BG and promote his philosophy. After finishing their travel in Guangzhou, Ekacakra still can not fulfil his ambition, He returned to Hongkong get the help from TKG. At that time, We challenge Ekacakra to tell us: what is his realization? Where He has received the authority of SP? Srila Prabhupada had mentioned to us the general principle of translation Vaishnava Sastra: " Srila Prabhupada went on to describe the special qualifications for translating Sanskrit Vaishanva literature. It would take a realized soul, he said " otherwise, simple imitating, A-B-C-D, it will not help. My purports are liked by people because it is presented as practical experience. It can't be done unless one is REALIZED" (Srila Prabhupada Lilamrtra p349 by Satsvarupa Das Goswami), but where Ekacakra and Umapati Swami have followed those principles? -- " Bhagavad-gita is also know as Gitopanish. It is the essence of Vedic knowledge and one of most important Upanisads in Vedic literature. Of course there are many commentaries in English on the Bhagavad-gita, and one may question the necessity for another oneÁÐ. Of course in American there are so many editions of Bhagavad-gita available in English, but as far as I have seen, not only in American but also in India, none of them can be strictly said to be authoritative because in almost every one of them the commentator has expressed his own opinions without touching the spirit of Bhagavad-gita as it is." (Introduction of BG P3), "Ð To interpret Bhagavad-gita without any reference to the will of Krishna is the great offense." Now in China there are four editions of Bhagavad-gita in Chinese by Ekacakra and Umapati Swami, but according to our Chinese understanding, one version is worse than another, the last version which has been re-written by Ekacakra and his wife Jahnava is most deviated, even the basic thing Ekacakra has made it wrong, not to speak of the key terms!! For example only in the preface part of SP Bhagavad-gita as it is, Ekacakra' s edition and translation has 19 point errors in meaning, In the introduction parts no only exists meaning errors but also has language mistakes. For example in the two Chapter of BG, text seven, Ekacakra's Chinese is most ludicrous, He translated " APPROACH (jie jin) a spiritual master" into "SURRENDER (gui yi ) to a spiritual master"; " Miserly weakness" into "weakness like miser ". In text 8, He translated " this grief which is drying up my senses" into " this grief which wilted my senses"; In his whole book, He translated "consciousness" into "yi shi " but not "zhi jue", that is fatal error! For in Chinese "yi shi " means "material world reflect on the person's brain", that is direct against the teaching of Bhagavad-gita " The supreme conscious isvara is similar to the living entity in this way: both the consciousness of the Lord and that of the living entity are transcendental. It IS NOT THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS GERERATED BY THE ASSOCIATION OF MATER. THAT IS A MISTAKEN IDEA. THE THEORY THAT CONSCIOUSNESS DEVELOPS UNDER CERTAIN CICUMSTANCES OF MATERIAL COMBINATION IS NOT ACCEPTED IN THE BHAGAVAD-GITA." (Bhagavad-gita as it is, introduction p11). After reading Ekacakra's Edition of Bhagavad-gita, we really don't know WHO Krishna is, and what the teaching of BG is!!! Even the basic logic of Chinese language Ekacakra and Umapati Swami has gone to the wrong way. In the following days, everything became most funny and ludicrous. TKG realized that his Chinese "disciples" have made such challenge to his Representative, It means indirect challenge to Himself. First TKG sent his plenipotentiary Cadrasekhara Das (former disciple of Bhavananda from Australia) to preach us the following philosophy--- "Ekacakra is authorized by HIS guru TKG to translate Srila Prabhupada's Books into Chinese, He is qualified to do such job, Ekacakra is the "supreme authority" on this matter; Umapati Swami is authority of Sanskrit, Sanskrit has spiritual potency (philosophy of Umapati swami, he is responsible for Sanskrit part translation, all Sanskrit was translated by Mandarin pronunciation but not need any translating their meaning, such as " Karma" his translation into Chinese is "ka er ma", Bhakti as "Ba ke ti" but not means devotion. " Lord Buddha" he translated into Chinese " Bu Ha Da " but not in Chinese "Fu Zhu")." When we asked where Srila Prabhupada's books have such saying or where SP said like that, Cadrasekhara Das told you that SP had said many time and many texts in SP's books have mentioned. When we asked him to offer some evidences, he told us to search for in SP books. But until now we still can not find such teachings as " Sanskrit has spiritual potency " in Srila Prabhupada's books. When Cadrasekhara Das found that his inability to answer our questions, he would say " anyway, I do not care about your Chinese, my English is such". After TKG's first plenipotentiary came back Hongkong with failure, He then sent his another representative B.C. Narasimha Swami (TKG gave him Swami Title) to come China. Except for preaching the same "teachings" as Cadrasekhara claimed, Narasimha Swami sold another kind of philosophy to us: "Srila Prabhupada's English is not so good, there are so many mistakes in Srial Prabhupada's books, we have to rectify those errors, Ekacakra and Umapati Swami has both qualification and authority to change it. Your Chinese Devotees have to accept the Authority of Ekacakra and Umapati Swami because they are representative of GBC and BBT. If you do not want to accept their Authority, it will be better to leave our iskcon and temple, Srila Prabhupada' said that those who stayed in iskcon and temple are craze and abnormal person, those who left iskcon and temple are normal person" This time, Narasimha Swami felt very upset with what has been happing in China, He never think his philosophy will lead to such great challenge from his Chinese associates and his would-be disciples. It is the China saying" the more you speak, the more mistake ". While Narasimha Swami wanted to defend Ekacakra and Umapati Swami's position, He unfortunately became another poor victim of TKG playing this " political game ". To defend Ekacakra and Umapati Swami's position means to protect his guru TKG's "Absolutely Authority" in China, then He has to reject Srila Prabhupada's in China, He has to find some faults with Srila Prabhupada's books and his conversations; Or to protect Srila Prabhupada's position he has to reject Ekacakra and Umapati Swami's teachings. Considering his hideous situation, Narasimha Swami left China. " The word muni means one who can agitate his mind in various ways for mental speculation without coming to a factual conclusion. It is said that every muni has a different angle vision, and unless a muni differs from another muni, he cannot be called a muni in the strict sense of the term." (Bhagavad-gita Chapter 2, text 56), It is true that TKG and his bloc want to step their feet on the head of Srila Prabhupada so that how can they become a muni? Srila Prabhupada is perfect, his teachings are perfect, TKG and his bloc have not preached Srila Prabhupada's teachings as it is to China fallen souls, so how can you said that SP's speaking sometimes is contradictory and his sometime also made mistakes? It was in 1993, one of TKG's former disciple Swarup Damodara Das has been questioned on Ekcakra and Umapati Swami's Behavior, Ekacakra and Umapati Swami emphasized too much time and effort on translating, printing the book of TKG " the story of Liguangshi " (later changed to " new science of yoga"), but neglected the books of Srila Prabhupada. Swarup Damodara Das has so many different opinions on this field with Ekacakra and Umapati Swami, later on he was kicked out to Christianity, now he becomes an enemy of iskcon in China. Later on the rumors spread in circles of TKG in China, IT says Swarup Damodara Das (SDD) is a great offender to guru and he has fallen down into a demo of devotees in China. But until now we still feel doubt about it, because some of our present devotees still have SDD's letter to expose TKG, Ekacakra and Umapati Swami's "lila" in China, SDD is the first China fallen souls found that the teachings of TKG differs from that of Srila Prabhupada. What has happened on SDD has been repeated on Yasoda DD and Bhakta Wang (a post graduated student in Beijing Uni.). Those unfortunate fallen souls have written letter to us, and told that TKG and his bloc from the very beginning looks down upon their Chinese " disciples ", and cover true teachings of Srila Prabhupada to us. It was in February 1998, TKG and Giridhari Swami as well as Umapati Swami has received letter on Translation of BG from Acyuta Das. In his letter, Acyuta Das (now he is a Bhakta according to Umapati Swami and Krishna Baladeva's opinion, for he rejected against Ekacakra BBT) strong condemned such tendency of defaming and criticizing Srila Prabhupada and his teachings in China through Ekacakra and Umapati Swami's Book, and such behavior of un-authorized changing Srila Prabhupada's Bhagavad-gita As It Is in Chinese (actually re-written), TKG and his bloc wrongly considered Acyuta das is a supporter of the "Ritvik", TKG sent Giridhari Swami to come China voting for support of Ekacakra and Umapati Swami's translation of BG, He tried to force Chinese Devotees to accept Ekacakra's Book. HE expected that the Chinese devotees support Ekacakra and Umapati will up to 70% from 10% and Yaso's Support rate will go down from 90% to 10%. We hope the thing would be happing as they expected, but result definitely made them disappointed, so until now them still cover the result of voting. Giridhari swami is leaving, Radha Caran Das (secretary of TKG, and "small guru") is coming to China with his guru TKG' s special mission. This time Radha Caran Das is seem to be more intelligent, He direct condemned Ekacakra and GBC, he told us he is also a victim of GBC current system, and Ekacakra is only one of GBC representative. But Radha caran Das did not mentioned any word of Chinese version BG, or what our response is, He just told us some things about Guru-Tattva, but he tried to step into such field as guru issues, he still made his Chinese associates disappointed at last. After in February 1998, TKG sent more his great Representatives to China, but on the case of Acyuta das, they all have made a fatal mistake: they kicked out Acyuta das and spread more rumors about AD, in Shanghai and Beijing Umapati Swami and Krishna Baladeva Das encouraged their Disciples to slander and attack personally Acyuta Das without any bases. They turned 70% of devotees in Govardhan and 90% of Devotees in Nanadgram into the "Ritvikist". Now TKG has banished his disciples in Govardhan and Nanadgram. Actually, we do not know anything about "the Ritvik heresy", we should thank Giridhari Swami for it is He who made us understood the true thing of "the ritvik heresy"---the teachings of Srila Prabhupada. Now in order to cracked down the "ritvik heresy" as TKG and his bloc called in China, TKG begun to introduced " Drutakarma heresy " into China, Krishna Baladeva Das and Umapati Swami has asked his disciples to translated the part 1 and part 2 of "Drutakarma Heresy " into Chinese, they want to poisoned Chinese fallen souls so that the sincere souls in future can not receive the teaching of Srila Prabhupada. TKG and his bloc in China is considered as evil cult (Article 8 of China Religious rule and regulation)", so why GBC of iskcon still let TKG, Umapati Swami and Krishna Baladeva Das (may be he will be a "guru " in the next Mayapur meeting) to bring "Drutakarma Heresy " to China? In Drutakarma Heresy theory, there are existing so many craze speculations and concocts about Srila Prabhupada's teachings. TKG, Ekacakra, Umapati Swami and Krishna Baladeva Das used Srila Prabhupada's name and ISKCON to defame and criticize Srila Prabhupada in China, now Drutakarma Heresy theory was used by TKG and his bloc to lead Chinese fallen souls to join into the program of offending against Srila Prabhupada in China. Now TKG and HIS BLOC have covered what has been happing in China to outside devotees, and hidden what has been happing in outside to Chinese Devotees. Coming back to the issue of Guru-tattva, We have been following the debate between Umapati and Krishankant, TKG and Krishnakant , Drutakarma and Krishnakant, We can say that our realizations on this issue will be much better than that of TKG and his bloc. Here we may question TKG and his bloc if they have participated any morning program in iskcon temple, otherwise how they can not understand such simple principle of Guru: ( Sri Sri Gurv-astaka ) Saksad-dharitvena samasta-sastrair Uktas tatha bhavyata eva sadhih Kitu prabhor yah priya eva tasya Vande guroh sri-caranaravindam ( Sri Guru-vadana) Sri guru karuna-sindhu, adhama janara bandhu Lokanath lokera jivana Ha ha prabhu koro doya, deho more pada-chaya Ebe jasa ghusuk tribhuvana So where TKG and his bloc in China showed such honor to Srila Prabhupada? And where those gurus like TKG and Umapati Swami and Krishna Baladeva as well as Drutakarma has been acknowledged in ALL REVEALED SRIPTURES AND FOLLOWED BY ALL AUTHORITIES? We have been watching what TKG and His bloc has done in China, But their behavior mistreated with the poor Chinese souls make us very hard to associate with a "guru" in the teaching of ISKCON!! But now in Shanghai and Beijing, in one way we are told that TKG is representative of Lord Krishna, Umapati Swami is pure devotee of Krishna, Krishna Baladeva and Radha Caran Das is most confidential servitor of TKG, they all are qualified to be a guru for they are 100% in Krishna Consciousness, and they has mastered the science of Krishna Consciousness, they can reveal the Vedic Conclusion to us. In another way we are told that Guru can be a conditioned soul. We are also told that those gurus and Mahajara are not different, but we are really told different teachings, those different teaching of Srila Prabhupada, those teachings different from different gurus in China. So TKG and his bloc is like Umapati swami and Drutakarma so confused and self-contradict, how can we put out faith on them to teach the teaching as it is to us? ("Krishna has maintained spiritual individuality all along; if he is accepted as an ordinary conditioned soul in individual consciousness, then His Bhagavad-gita has no value as authoritative scripture. A Common man with all the fours defects of human frailty is unable to teach that which is worth hearing." Bhagavad-gita as it is Chapter 2 text 12 purport). " Therefore, if the absolute truth is one, about which we can think there is no different of opinion, the guru also CANNOT be TWO. The Acaryadeva to whom we have assembled tonight offer our humble homage is not the guru of a sectarian institution or one out of many differing exponents of the truth. On the contrary, he is the JAGAD-GURU, Guru of all of us" (The Universal Teacher by Srila Prabhupada ). So as we can see, in China we already have different gurus, one guru will teach something different from that of another guru. We are told by Krishna Baladeva Das that Guru can be fallen down and TKG is such a spiritual master who can reveal the Vedic Conclusions to us!!! But now we have been waiting for more than ten years in China for such "Vedic conclusions", in TKG's great masterpiece " Srila Prabhupada's Order", even such simple thing as " parampara was broken " TKG understood as " Parampara was ended ", so how can we trust them to reveal the Vedic conclusion to us. Actually, TKG and His Bloc has not yet reached to any Vedic Conclusions, otherwise how can those gurus in China necessary preach another " fallen guru" philosophy to us? Most unfortunate things are: They taught his innocent disciples to use Chaper 9:30 of Bhagavad-gita as an excuse to defend the behavior of fallen gurus. WE are called by TKG, Umapati and Krishna Baladeva as demo, offender and ritvikist and Mayavadi, here we would like to them to answer us the following questions: what is demo? What is offence? What is ritvik? What is Mayavadi? When we have obtained mystic power to commit offence unto them? ii TEXT21: "Whatever action a great man performs, common men follow. And whatever standards he sets by exemplary acts, all the world pursues." Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu said that a teacher should behave properly before he begins teaching. One who teaches in that way is called acarya, or an ideal teacher. Therefore, a teacher must follow the principle sastra to teach the common man. The teacher cannot manufacture rules against the principle of revealed scriptures, like Manu-samhita and similar other, are considered the standard books to be followed by human society. Thus the leader's teaching should be based on the principles of such standard sastra.( Bhagavad-gita as it is Chapter 3, purport). Mantra nine: " Those who engage in the culture of Nescient activities shall enter into the darkest region of ignorance. Worse still are those engaged in the culture of so-called knowledge." According to the Vedas, Mistaken mundane educators are known as 1) Veda-vada-rata, 2) mayapahrta-jnana, 3) asuram bhavam asrita, and 4) naradhama. ÁÐ But veda-vada-rata people, instead of realizing the purport of the Vedas, take it for granted that side issues such as ÁÐ. Such people misguide others by misinterpreting Vedic literature, Sometime they also condemn the Puranas, which are authentic Vedic explanation for laymen. The Veda-vada ratas give their own explanations of the Vedas, neglecting of the authority of great teacher (acaryas). They also tend to raise some un-scrupulous person from among themselves and flaunt him as the leading exponent of Vedic knowledgeÁÐ.(Sri Isopanisad ) Text 1: Translation: " Sri Sukadeva Goswami said: O king Pariksit, when Bali Maharaja was thus advised by his spiritual master, Sukracarya, his family priest, he remained silent for some time, and then, after full deliberation, he replied to his spiritual master as follows." Purport: ÁÐ How could he disobey the instruction of Sukracarya, his spiritual master? It is the duty of such a sober personality a Bali Maharaja to abide by the orders of his spiritual master immediately, as his spiritual master had advised. But Bali Maharaja also considered that The Sukracarya was no longer to be accepted as a spiritual master, for he had deviated from the duty of a spiritual master. According to sastra, the duty of the guru is to take the disciple back home, back to Godhead. If he is unable to do so and instead hinders the disciple in going back to Godhead, he should not be a guru. Gurur na sa syat (Sri Bhagavatam. 5.5.18). One should not become a guru if he cannot enable his disciple to advance in Krishna Consciousness, The goal of life is to become a devotee of Lord Krishna so that one may freed from the bondage of material existenceÁÐ. Anyone who is supposed to be a guru but who goes against the principle of Visnu-bhakti cannot be accepted as a guru. ( Srimad Bhagavatam Canto 8, Ch20:Text1 and purport ) "Sukracarya, being a person of material world, did not know the principles of a devotee, a devotee is determined to serve the Supreme Personality of Godhead to His full satisfaction. Anything that hampers such determination should certainly be rejected." So considering the one part events of above mentioned, we decided to write this report to GBC of ISKCON and BBT, we hope you will understand the fact that TKG, Umapati Swami, Ekacakra Das, Krishna Baladeva Das, Radha Caran Das, Narasimha Swami and Cadrasekhara Das can not represent Srila Prabhupada in China, they can not preach the teaching of Srila Prahupada to his "Chinese disciples". In the past ten years, they have done more damages than developement the good fame of Srila Prabhupada's ISKCON in China. For the sake of Srila Prabhhpada's movement and the mission of Lord Caitanya, please take necessary actions to check their behaviors. Considering TKG and his bloc's mistreat with our Chinese fallen souls and telling lie to us, we all reject TKG and his bloc as our guru, and we also strong condemn the Drutakarma Heresy Theory in China. WE do not want "the war", if TKG and HIS bloc will use his other part "disciples" to continue to defame Srila Prabhupada and fight against his "fallen disciples " in China, WE will definitely give "a good return". Under the leadership and guide of the GBC of Srila Prabhupada's ISCKON and Sincere Followers of Srila Prabhupada, WE will still support and accept any decisions and resolutions come from the GBC of SP. If we make any offences you, we beg at your lotus feet for your forgiveness! Haribol! Your servant who try to please Srila Prabhupada and all Vaishnava devotees. All Devotees at Govardhan Yatra and Nanadgram Yatra: Guruseva das & Lalita Prana dd Hamsika dd,Ilavati ,Gaura lila das & Nitya lila dd Jatayu das & Sumuki dd, Jaya Gaura das , Vasudeva das, Karunika dd, Malati dd, Nitai caran das & Krsnagi dd, Sumrtra dd, Yasodhara dd, Bhakta Quan, Bhakta Rong Bhakta Hang & Bhaktine Zhou Acyuta das, Jiv Krishan Das, Pandava Das and Yutika dd, Natasuta das & Harini dd Sesa Das, Bhakta Zhao, Dhruva Das, Samadi Das, Harideva Das and Sasaga dd, Vanamali Das Yamunacharya Das, Cittahari Das, Cudamani dd, Dukhahantri dd, Tulasi dd, Krishna Kumari dd Liladhara Das and Lilawati dd, Bhakta shu, Bhakta Liu, Bhakta Yu and Bhaktine Ning. See Related VNN Stories This story URL: http://vaishnava-news-network.org/world/WD9812/WD07-2627.html |
