EDITORIAL November 23, 1998 VNN2546 See Related VNN Stories Women, Equality and GHQ BY PRTHA DEVI DASI
EDITORIAL, Nov 23 (VNN) I give Guru-Krsna das credit for being the only one, as of this writing,courageous enough to come forward and speak publicly, though I cannot say Iagree with him. It does appear, however, he is sincere and believes what hesays as truth.
Regarding his definition of conspiracy, what actually resulted certainly wasnot harmonious. Comments about investigating for the purpose of discoveringgarbage on others and bringing it forward to disempower them is not harmonious.Just look at the mentality/consciousness of some of those posts. Their truelevel of advancement shows through, even swearing, making degrading commentsabout *another* name for IWM. This is not a sign of spirtually advancedqualified men. Though I will not lump them all in, as each is an individual.
To have the IWM superseded by, amalgamated with, or governed by the GrihastaMinistry is not as sweet as it sounds. If they succeed with their concept ofVedic, a wife must do whatever her husband tells her to do. "Right or wrong,my husband is always right." He, in turn, will do whatever the good old boysclub tell him to do. Thus, the Grihastha Ministry would result with menpredominantly in charge. Women have already tried this. It didn't work. Whatmakes them think they are more qualified this time around? Not a criticism. Noone is perfect. It is Srila Prabhupada who is perfect and qualified. That iswho devotee women want to follow. Therefore there is nothing to fear, and thatis what it is about. Fear, and loss of power and control (which they fear).Let the IWM do it's job. Secure men who are doing well in their devotionalservice, their self-esteem and aren't control freaks, will not find such womena threat.
Some devotee men state that women are to be protected and that is all they aretrying to do. Unfortunately there is often confusion between protection andcontrol. They are different.
When gurukulis hear the kind of preaching of the GHQ, it pushes them rightout the door. They stop coming around. However, they get the criticism for itand not those who are propagating such philosophies. If the GHQ sincerely careabout woman and child protection, they need to stop and consider the effectthey will have on these gurukulis. Regardless of their age, they are stillour children. We made the mess, we need to clean it up. Ignoring them is notprotection. They still need us, if we can only qualify ourselves to connectwith them. That would be a better mission. Such philosophies are notpreaching. So, who is it really for? Not a question to be answered. Just alittle food for thought.
No one is going against the "right" contravene the sacred duty of a Vaisnavias wife and mother. Some ladies have dedicated theimself to raising theirchildren and so on, yet have godsisters who are of another nature. They mustbe responsible for their children of course (as must the fathers), but if theycan take care of that, there is no reason they should not do devotional serviceaccording to what they know as their natural propensity, not what others tellthem their natural propensity should be. It simply needs to be understood thatwife and mother alone will not get one back to godhead, neither did Prabhupadainstruct women to do only this.
Srila Prabhupada: "It is not that women should only produce children, but theyare meant for advancing in devotion." (letter to Jayatirtha, 1975)
If Srila Prabhupada wanted us to follow Manu Samhita and other scriptures, hewould have translated them.
"Prabhupada Nectar, Vol 1, by Satsvarupa dasa Goswami (p. 27)
"I discussed the contents of your letter with His Divine Grace Srila Prabhupada. Srila Prabhupada stated that our grihastas should simply chant fifty rounds before conceiving a child. Prabhupada said, 'We do not want all these rituals. Chanting Hare Krsna is our only business. According to Manu-samhita you are all mlecchas and yauvanas. You cannot touch the Manu-samhita, what to speak of translating it. So if you try to follow the Manu-samhita then you will become a mleccha and yauvana and your career is finished." -- Letter of May 19, 1977
That last line is important. If we try to follow Manu-samhita we will becomemleccha's and yauvana's and our career as a devotee is finished. SrilaPrabhupada has said like this. That is sufficient. It is therefore dangerousto rationalize in the mind why it is all right to continue reading otherscripture. The instruction has been given. Finished. We need to read SrilaPrabhupada's books. He went out of his way to translate them for us and now wethink we need something more? Or that we've got it, time to move on? No. Weall have a long way to go. However, not only must we focus on Prabhupada'sbooks, but his lectures, letters and personal instructions. These are of equalimportance to Vedic literature, if not more. The instructions of the puredevotee jagat guru are the most important.
Some of the men on GHQ believe in polygamy for kali-yuga. It was anexperiment Srila Prabhupada had us try. It did not work. He ended it. That'sthat. Their desire for another wife has little to do with woman protection andwill not resolve the divorce issue as some claim. We all know the *real*reason men want more than one wife.
When Srila Prabhupada speaks of the lower or inferior position of women, he isspeaking of Varnasrama -dharma social order in a Vedic system, nottranscendental Krishna Consciousness, which has entirely differentinstructions. Srila Prabhupada did not come here to teach us to be Vedic, butto teach us to be Krishna Conscious. Vedic is a culture. Krishna Consciusnessis transcendental. He gave women brahman initiation. That is not Vedic. Whywould he give brahman initiation if he did not want women on the altar? So hewanted women as pujaris. He also had them go out in the streets and preach,talk to men, distribute books. That is not Vedic. Many examples can be given.Let us not get stuck in terminology used to please the senses. Though all suchliterature is to be respected, the flowery words of the Vedas are whatPrabhupada preached.
Some men have a hard time accepting the idea that woman are equal. They hidebehind Vedic scriptures, but more often than not it has to do with theirmanhood rather than their spirit soul. Therefore it needs to be understoodthat equality does not mean a man looses his manhood if he accepts women asequal, and a woman must not become like a man to be equal. They are different,yes, but still equal. After all, kalau sudra sambhavat: in this age of kali-yuga, everyone is sudra. However, the idea is to get beyond these bodily designations and treateveryone right.
Srila Prabhupada: "We are Vaishnavas. We are not concerned with male offemale position in life. That is simply bodily concept of life. It is notspiritual. Whether one is male or female, it does not matter, simply chantHare Krishna and follow the four regulative principles and your life will beperfect." (letter to Jennifer, 1975)
Srila Prabhupada: '"You dance, she dances. You sing, she sings, you cook, shecooks, there is no difference. You are the same in Krishna's eyes."
"I am all-devouring death, and I am the generator of all things yet to be. Among women I am fame, fortune, speech, memory, intelligence, faithfulnessand patience." Bhagavad-gita 10:34
Srila Prabhupada: "Regarding your questions about the examination to be given,the girls will also be able to take these. In Krishna Consciousness there isno distinction between girls and boys. The girls also may become preachers ifthey are able." (letter to Himavati, 1969)
I wish to add, not all devotee men believe like the GHQ.
It will be hard for those who have spent half a lifetime believing they aresuperior to admit they made a mistake. This is understandable. I pray thatafter reading Srila Prabhupada's instructions on transcendental KrishnaConsciousness they will be humble enough to admit to this as a mistake andhave a change of heat.
Your Servant, Prtha devi dasi
See Related VNN Stories
This story URL: http://vnn.org/editorials/ET9811/ET23-2546.html
NEWS DESK | EDITORIALS | TOP Surf the Web on
|