|
What Is "Vaishnava"
Vaishnavism as established in the ancient Vedic literature, geographically
manifested in a place known today as India. Vedic literature proclaims
that the knowledge about the mundane world accompanied with the
complete temporary creation, as well as the spiritual worlds with
all their variegatedness, rely on eternal principles, i.e., there
is no beginning neither end to them. The mundane worlds are also
part of the eternal spiritual manifestation, but since they function
as a "temporary manifestation of the same spiritual substance"
where from manifest, they are called "material".
Since India has been the geographical area where the preservation
and practice of the teachings contained in the Vedas took actually
place, the general belief is that the Vedas "belong" to India.
Nowhere in the Vedas the word "India" or "Hinduism" is found,
therefore to label the Vedas as belonging to any particular part
or religious group of this minute world is not to do justice to
its teachings. The Vedas explain how the mundane or temporary
creation takes place. They describe three main entities which
promote the temporary creation, maintenance and destruction of
the mundane worlds. Lord Brahma is a title given to an exalted
living entity who earned the right to be the person manifesting
a temporary creation of the mundane worlds. Lord Shiva is an eternal
manifestation of the Supreme who is also in constant touch with
the mundane sphere, who in due course of time promotes its destruction
or temporary annihilation. Finally, Lord Vishnu is the maintainer
of the total mundane manifestation, and is identified as the Supreme
Lord Himself.
The term "Vaishnava" and "Vaishnavism" have also somehow come
to be used in a narrow, restricted sense which they hardly deserve.
Properly speaking, a "Vaishnava" is one who pays homage to "Vishnu",
which means, "The Immanent Principle which pervades and permeates
the universe". "Vishnu" is the "Indwelling Spirit", the Preservative
Principle of Cosmic Creation. It underlies all things in existence
and directs the operations of the world of action. What is called
the Noumenon or the Substance is Vishnu, as also that which in
common terms is called Providence, the wise caretaker who orders
the smooth working and general well-being of the entire universe.
So, all those who believe in the Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent
Being, in Whom, by Whom, and for Whom is all creation all come
under the denomination of this comprehensive term" and Vaishnavism
accommodates them all, assigning to them their proper places in
the gradual evolution of the soul. What sane thinker is there,
who will not entertain this rational view of the conception of
God" What philosophy, what religion that will not accept the fundamental
principles which alone can solve the great problems of life and
death"
Vaishnavism contains four classic schools of thought (sampradayas).
They each have their own unique theological identity, and coexist
in continuity with earlier traditions. Although bearing some different
philosophical approach, all sampradayas accept that Vishnu or
Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. A boom period for
Vaishnavism developed in India from the 12th through the 16th
centuries. There were many great Vaishnava kings and kingdoms
with advanced sociopolitical and educational institutions. Even
though Vaishnavism gained popularity during such specific periods,
its mundane recorded history reaches several millennia back. All
Vaishnava traditions advocate Bhakti-Yoga (union in devotion)
as found in the Bhagavad-gita and the Srimad-Bhagavatam. Their
philosophical propositions differ in their presentations of the
personal nature of God and His relationship with the mundane world
and with an infinite number of individual souls; however, even
if such differences exist, they should not be considered to be
like the superficial conflicts of snobbish intellectuals. Rather,
they are exemplary expressions of spiritual variegatedness in
which devotees of a living tradition are experiencing a specific
relationship with the Supreme Person. They manifest a natural
and spontaneous eagerness to establish their particular rasa or
relationship above all others and that is a characteristic symptom
of Bhakti. Nonetheless, their common adherence to devotional service
to their beloved Lord far outweighs the insignificant differences
between them.
|
|
|