VNN Europe - Statement by JPS on Russian Situation


© 1998 VNN

EUROPE

09/16/1998 - 2232

Statement by JPS on Russian Situation


India (VNN) - by Jayapataka Swami

Camp: Sri Mayapur Dhama Date: Originally Drafted September 3, 1998.

My Dear ISKCON devotees in Russia,

Please accept my humble obeisances and best wishes. All glories to Srila Prabhupada!

This letter is to explain my position and to offer some advice for ISKCON devotees in CIS and everywhere to the followers of Harikesa Maharaja.

1. MY ACTUAL POSITION IN RELATION TO HARIKESA MAHARAJA'S RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS AND OTHER EVENTS.

It has been brought to my attention that some followers of Harikesa Maharaja in Russia are claiming that I am supporting their revolution against ISKCON. This claim is not true, and it is creating confusion amongst Harikesa Maharaja's disciples and amongst other devotees who have some faith in me. I am a well wisher, friend and God-brother of Harikesa Maharaja and want to see that he has a peaceful Krishna conscious life. I would like to see a peaceful positive resolution to the present difficulties and misunderstandings. That led me to see Harikesa Maharaja and report the highlights of my visits.

This respect and love that I feel for Harikesa Maharaja shouldn't be misrepresented as a support for rebellion or aggression against Srila Prabhupada, ISKCON or ISKCON's devotees. I would not have written this letter, but I am compelled to do so due to this misrepresentation of my position.

How is it possible for me to support a revolution for leaving the shelter of Srila Prabhupada? Srila Prabhupada has always said to remain in ISKCON and work towards improving his movement. Srila Prabhupada said ISKCON was "his body". So there is no way that I can support such a stand.

According to reports I am receiving, there is an extreme polarisation being promoted in Russia by Kamalamala das, Sannyas das, and Brahmananda Puri das. This action is completely contrary to what they assured me they wanted when we met in Germany. They told me they wanted to be in ISKCON, and that we would work together to bring Harikesa Maharaja back to ISKCON. I did support their staying humbly in ISKCON and working co-operatively to spread Krishna consciousness. That was something I appreciated.

However, now things have changed. I certainly don't agree to an aggressive promotion of Harikesa Maharaja's new ideas nor to an appeal for Harikesa Maharaja's disciples to leave Srila Prabhupada's house and our spiritual family of ISKCON.

Furthermore, I do not support Harikesa Maharaja's present attitude and dealings toward Srila Prabhupada. I feel it is outside the bounds of etiquette to criticise or mention demeaning things about any properly situated spiritual master, what to speak of a faultless spiritual master like Srila Prabhupada. Srila Prabhupada is due all of our respect and love.

Adjustments of preaching strategies can be easily proposed within ISKCON without denigrating the position of our Founder Acharya. I am shocked and very hurt by the public criticisms and minimisation being directly or indirectly aimed at Srila Prabhupada. I never expected this to happen from Harikesa Maharaja or any of his followers. These things should be carefully avoided.

Harikesa Maharaja's present portrayal of ISKCON as a dangerous sect and his declaration of leaving ISKCON cause me great pain. ISKCON is Srila Prabhupada's body and is sheltering millions of devotees both in the temples and in the broader congregation. Harikesa Maharaja has sacrificed so much personal energy and service for the betterment of ISKCON. Now it is almost inconceivable that he is denouncing the society, which has also provided so much spiritual development for him and his disciples.

I emphatically do not support this negative portrayal of ISKCON. I am an ISKCON member and am giving all of my energy to seeing to the development and improvement of ISKCON. It is painful if someone near and dear doesn't want to remain any longer in ISKCON, but what can we do? ISKCON is a free society, and people can stay or leave as they like. However, openly and un-constructively criticising ISKCON or its members should be totally avoided. I certainly, and I am sure all ISKCON members including Harikesa Maharaja's disciples, would like to see our dear Harikesa Maharaja's outlook of ISKCON and Srila Prabhupada return to the standard of his 1998 Vyasa Puja offering to Srila Prabhupada.

As far as the treatment of Harikesa Maharaja has received during and after his recent collapse by the Executive Committee (EC) of the ISKCON Governing Body Commission (GBC) is concerned I think that they took extreme care to do the right thing. I consider that all the EC members are and were well intentioned in all they did.

At first I felt, along with other GBC's of Russia, that some of the technical aspects of the notification could have been improved and more sensitive. I appreciated the EC's apology letter which explained the difficult situation they were under. This graciousness of the EC was appreciated by everyone at the temples I discussed it.

I tried to explain to Harikesa Maharaja in our first meeting that it really was a very minor restriction that the EC placed, and if he could demonstrate he was healthy enough to do his duties then he could soon be reinstated. However, by then he had already decided he didn't want to be part of ISKCON. It definitely seemed like he was over-reacting to the EC decisions. Even then, I was trying to smooth things out. The apology letter from the EC demonstrates that they didn't want to upset Harikesa Maharaja or his disciples and assured of future enhanced sensitivity.

2. HOW I WAS CHEATED AND MY GOOD INTENTIONS EXPLOITED

During our meeting, Harikesa Maharaja stated clearly to me that he didn't want to be the leader of a spiritual organisation. Specifically, he said he didn't want to be a "sect leader". Later, when the Russian leaders were present (Kamalamala das, Sannyasa das and Brahmananda Puri das), Harikesa Maharaja asked them to discuss with me and work out something peaceful.

My point to them was that if they wanted to be inside, then I would work for that. If they wanted to be outside, then it could be a clean break, avoiding confrontation. The three met me twice for almost two hours each time. They were very clear that they wanted to be part of ISKCON, and they wanted Harikesa Maharaja to also be a part of ISKCON in the future.

We understood that presently, by his own desire, Harikesa Maharaja has declared himself out of ISKCON. We agreed that if things got normalised and some steps were taken to consider Harikesa Maharaja's proposals then the climate might be made right for him to return to ISKCON. I confess that I felt more optimistic after Harikesa Maharaja told me three times during my final visit that he might come back if things improved in ISKCON.

The three Russians gave details on how they would allow ISKCON sannyasis, GBCs and Gurus to again enter and preach in St. Petersburg. They would submit to the ISKCON discipline. They said they didn't want to destroy the relationship between the congregation in St. Petersburg and the temple so they requested not to have any announcement that they left ISKCON since for sure they wanted to be back.

They only wanted some assurance that blasphemy against Harikesa Maharaja would be avoided. They assured me they wouldn't politicise the Radio since public confrontation would attract Government attention and in CIS that could be disastrous. Already laws were in place allowing Government to come down heavy on most religious groups without much protection of law. I have been enthusiastically telling my GBC colleagues to hold off and GIVE PEACE A CHANCE.

Unfortunately, the report I got is that when Sannyas das, Kamalamala das and Brahmananda Puri das returned to Russia they brought a new Harikesa Maharaja video as well as an audio interview for the radio. By now you have all probably read the transcripts of both of these productions. Just the fact that they broadcast such things on the radio and are planning to distribute Harikesa Maharaja's video endorsing his new ideas and leaving ISKCON is very confrontational.

More serious is that the radio broadcast contains statements that are directly derogatory and offensive towards Srila Prabhupada.

Now receiving these reports I feel cheated that my good intentions have been politically exploited and misused in order to bewilder devotees and encourage people to leave ISKCON. Srila Prabhupada has always preached to remain within the ISKCON family. How can I endorse that people should leave? This is very political and I couldn't imagine that these devotees would stoop so low as to misuse my desire to help them in such a way. Many leaders had been quite emphatic that we shouldn't trust them, but I was preaching for restraint and to give them a chance.

Look what they have done! I would like it to go down in everyone's memory and for the permanent record that full opportunity was extended to these Russian devotees to be accepted back in ISKCON. If they now are doing politics to encourage devotees to leave ISKCON it is their own free will. I worked to give them the opportunity to remain in ISKCON, but they have misused my attempts. I was trying to create an environment where all Harikesa Maharaja disciples could serve nicely in ISKCON and in which Harikesa Maharaja could more easily return.

Now I am told there is simply chaos and confrontation caused by them. I hope they will come to their senses and avoid confrontation and creating chaos. After all they are all Srila Prabhupada's grandchildren who have sacrificed much for the Krishna conscious cause. It is senseless and destructive to fight amongst ourselves. Our energy should be used to uplift fallen souls and not to promote enmity or division amongst the Vaishnavas thus playing into the hands of materialistic enemies who wish our mutual termination.

3. HARIKESA MAHARAJA'S CURRENT RELATIONSHIP WITH SRILA PRABHUPADA

In the first meeting with Harikesa Maharaja I explained that he told me he didn't agree with some things Srila Prabhupada did. He wanted to change these. He mentioned how when he was in his emotional volcano he was even angry at Srila Prabhupada, but then he cooled down. In the second meeting Harikesa Maharaja said his relationship was now all right. I was feeling optimistic.

However, when I read the transcript of the recent Radio broadcast of an interview between Harikesa Maharaja and Brahmika das (a Russian disciple), I saw that Harikesa Maharaja stated disrespectful things about Srila Prabhupada. It is offensive to Srila Prabhupada to say such things.

(Hari Sauri Prabhu has responded that while he was Srila Prabhupada personal secretary he always saw Srila Prabhupada acting exemplary and such statements are completely unfounded in fact.)

Now when I compare what Harikesa Maharaja told me during the first visit, with this last statement in the radio interview, it is clear that Harikesa Maharaja really doesn't accept Srila Prabhupada like he used to. Because I had been very anxious for a solution during the second visit with Harikesa Maharaja, when he said his relationship with Srila Prabhupada was okay, I can now see I got overly optimistic and took him at his word. It is not okay from the Krishna conscious standpoint.

Instead of following Srila Prabhupada as his absolute authority, Harikesa Maharaja is now apparently following new intuitions and other guides. Hopefully in the future he will again realise that Srila Prabhupada is the dependable and proper person to take shelter of.

4. THE PRESENT VOLATILE SITUATION IN CIS

Harikesa Maharaja told me a week ago that he wanted his disciples to go on with their devotional service, but now he is doing something else by supporting the revolutionaries in Russia. It seems we cannot depend today on what Harikesa Maharaja says. It is changing quite rapidly. Therefore what is the use of reporting it?

Although Harikesa Maharaja claims to be reasonable, what is being proposed or endorsed doesn't seem reasonable for Krishna conscious devotees. Of course, we don't know to what extent those advocating rebellion in Russia are misrepresenting him. Certainly it contradicts his standing instructions for so many years and his present instruction to not do any violence to anyone.

Allowing or encouraging his fanatic disciples in Russia to issue his mass video release, knowing it could cause mass chaos in Russia, is completely against what he told me he wanted. So now I don't know how much value to place on what he tells me or anyone. It is changing without warning.

My appeal is that all Harikesa Maharaja disciples should stay within the shelter of ISKCON. Continue on with sadhana bhakti and devotional service. There is absolutely nothing to be gained to leave the association and shelter of the wonderful devotees of ISKCON. How can ISKCON devotees be called cult or sect members? They are the most wonderful people I have ever met. I cannot imagine a better association to be in. Let us all work co-operatively to bring up ISKCON to a higher level---to show that are happy in Krishna consciousness and from that position invite Harikesa Maharaja to come back and be with us.

We don't need psychotherapy centres to teach us how to love. We can learn that practically in Krishna consciousness by careful Vaishnava dealings. We are grateful for all that Harikesa Maharaja has done and we want him to return to ISKCON to continue serving Srila Prabhupada as is his duty as a disciple. My heart is heavy that my beloved Godbrother has decided to separate himself from his family members. I am still hoping upon hope and praying that eventually Harikesa Maharaja will see the light and come back to ISKCON knowing that he is always welcome to return to his home. I implore Harikesa Maharaja and anyone who considers himself as his follower, not to do anything that will disturb the peaceful environment of the devotees in ISKCON or anyone for that matter.

Provocative videos and political radio broadcasts in Moscow are disturbing the minds of devotees unnecessarily. All these political manoeuvres and provocative actions should be immediately stopped. Brahmananda Puri das had previously given me a written request to avoid doing something provocative. I am amazed that now so many provocative things are going on.

If there are devotees who are determined not to serve in ISKCON let them peacefully go their way, but they should not try to compel other devotees to also leave their devotional service. That is not proper. So please everyone should act as gentlemen and ladies and avoid all kinds of Vaishnava aparadha (offences to Vaishnavas). I am sorry I have to say all these things, but since my name is being broadcast that I am endorsing everything being done in the name of Harikesa Maharaja I have no choice but to make my position clear.

Please, in the future, before taking seriously any claim about what my stand is or what I am supposed to be saying please contact me directly. When I reported on the two meetings with Harikesa Maharaja, I clearly mentioned that I was just stating what Harikesa Maharaja told me I could say. I specifically stated that they were not my own endorsements with these words:

"As far as what my realisations about this visit were, apart for one paragraph, I haven't gone into that here. So please don't take my repetition of his [Harikesa Maharaja's] statements as any kind of personal endorsement from me."

Still somehow this reporting has been misunderstood as an endorsement from me. So please don't think like that. My reporting wasn't any kind of personal endorsement. Actually now I may have to report less about any meetings since they are being used as propaganda against ISKCON which is deplorable and political. I hope I will be able to maintain a positive link with Harikesa Maharaja and that relations with ISKCON will remain cordial leading to an eventual reunion. Thank you for your patience.

Your well wisher,

Jayapataka swami


NEWS DESK | EUROPE | TOP

Surf the Web on